Law of evidence to manage the South China Sea

The great conflict occurs when the waters of the difference between the familiar in the area of the sea of South China at the forefront. Considering that, at the present time, China, Brunei, the Philippines, the Malaysia, Viet Nam and Taiwan claim to be the owner of the water is supposed to be rich in oil and gas.

From there, the United States took part in Bali ASEAN Regional Forum urged countries to ask the central claim of legal evidence. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke.

In recent weeks, triggering a war of litigation claims between China-Philippines and also between the China - Viet Nam.

Clinton said: the incident in the South China Sea could threaten peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. He also stressed to seek a peaceful solution to the problem is that the national interests of the United States.

In fact, Clinton's appeal is the repetition of the previous statement. At this time, China was upset because China considers that the Declaration, which it attacked. Beijing considers the Bill Clinton of Minister of Foreign Affairs as a form of intervention. The Peking Government confirms, this problem must be solved by countries who claim ownership of the South China Sea.

New concerns if the claims in the South China Sea war did not review for a way out as soon as possible, it could lead to conflicts that threaten the stability of the region. Because a number of countries will face.

However, the question is who has the right to water which can be explained by the law. Each country print map their own version since a few decades earlier and often overlapping Interstate limit only.